An Excerpt from Dr. Asher's book,

Soul Revolution

Genesis 1 – The Grammatical Error!

As you will see after this section, when I render the Genesis 1 texts grammatically, contextually and literally corrected, the story is quite a bit different, and it isn’t painting the historically accepted picture. It should also be noted that the higher practitioners’ within the  Orthodoxy  know  the  context  as  I  corrected  it,  although  their practice is to deny it.

It should also be known that certain ancient Jewish sages who were  forced  to  deal  with  these  flaws  publicly,  pretty  much  gave nothing more than apologies for the alleged grammatical errors, and highly  biased  personal  opinions  on  the  contexts.  I  use  the  word alleged here because of course, I believe it to be subterfuge. To prove it as such, I need only point to the well-known and highly touted rabbinical constant; the belief and teaching that not one letter or vowel point is out of place in the Hebrew bible; which is based on the strict  scribal  criteria  of  creating  these  texts  via  the  (Masora  – Traditional discipline of rules for writing or copying – 7th CE).

We are then left to believe that such a blatant and obvious mistake such as this, and that which I am about to show you, has gone unnoticed all this time. Of course, anyone who has read any of my other books already knows that I have pointed out hundreds of textual  and  cultural  falsities,  text  story  doublets  and  triplets  that don’t match, and a plethora of contradictions throughout the English and Hebrew bibles.
Now, using basic facts and logic a second time here, we can refute  the  additional  apologies,  opinions  and  excuses  about  what vowels were used where, and or which vowel marking (or  Nikud) were added under which letter, etc.  Because again, the (Nikud) – vowel markings did not exist when the earliest Genesis stories were penned out of our long oral tradition. Which points to the obvious, that the prefix in question was added much later, along with  the vowelization markings, and along with its subsequent and alleged meanings, both grammatically, and spiritually.

The   Aleppo   Codex   dated   900CE   is   the   oldest   Hebrew Torah/bible  in  existence  that  we  know  of.  And  it  was  my  associated lineage namesake Aaron ben’Asher in the 10th  century who designed and
added the vowelization and cantillation notes to those texts based on their traditional Tiberian system.  So in any case, for now, this is as far back as we can go with any complete Hebrew Torah text.  Strangely enough in the English/Hebrew concordance’s, I have seen how they tend to leave the Hebrew prefix in question out of the Genesis 1 text. That is interesting.

I  would  like  to  preface  this  before  I  start  by  reminding everyone that the later scribes for many generations had their own pens and opinions all over our texts.

In the be’ginning?

Everyone    knows,    that    within    all    Western    language translations and the Hebrew alike, all render the first line of Genesis as – In the Beginning

Reshiyth = (Raysheeth):

"בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים" = “B’reshiyth bara Elohim”, always translated as,  "In  the  beginning,  God  created..." However,  from  the  first Hebrew  letter/word  (bet-ב)  this  is  a  blatant  grammatical  error! Having  that  understanding  now,  if  you  pay  close  attention  as  we progress through this teaching, later you will see how its letter/word addition and subsequent translation, changes what could very well be one of the most important points of our entire existence here. Even hiding the truth of what was being created, and by whom.

Many of you may also have heard people say that, yes, it should really be translated as – “In the beginning of….” This is based on the reality that the two-word construct, or (Smichute) of Be’reshiyth, should have had a different vowel mark – (be’ – has been depicted with the Sh-va vowelization mark), but should have been depicted with the (Kamatz) vowelization mark under it.

However, the real issue is the word (Reshiyth)-it’s true literal meaning we will get into shortly, had someone added the correct (Kamatz)  vowelization  point under the  letter  (Bet),  making  it  (Ba- Reshiyth); then this might start looking like – “In the beginning God Page created…” – However, now we run into another major issue. Problem two – Created What?

Simply stated, for the construct word “Be-Reshiyth” to exist grammatically correct here, the next word after it would need to be a “noun”  describing  “what”  was  being  created!  However,  the  next word is “bara” which is a verb! (Bara means create or created).

So  now  your  mechanical  translation  of  “B’-reshiyth  bara Elohim” would be closer to - "In the first beginning of God, created." Obviously that can’t be, but there it is in black and white worldwide, mistranslated to something it is not. Was it done on purpose?  Was it just a mistake added so long ago no one wanted to fix it?

Reshiyth – (Raysheeth):

The  elder  and  more  literal  meaning  of  this  word  can  be expressed several ways in English, as -
*Chief part of a year or reign; *first phase, step, or element in a course of events; *first of a thing or of a kingdom; *first king; first god, segment or cycle of crops; *first or earliest segment of a nation or place; *first of a harvest, etc. (First!)

To narrow it down as meaning “In the Beginning” is both limiting and not in the correct context with what comes next from the literal translation of the rest of the words in this Genesis text. This will be more evident within the actual translation to come.

However for most religionists, it will remain a grammatical mess which they believe to have very purposeful spiritual intent and significance. While waving their hands using Jedi mind tricks they will say – “you don’t see any grammatical or temporal errors here, you seem confused, tired, go now and return to your slumber…” But in the end there remain 49 lines of Bible text where this word is used 51 times, all predominantly used to express its true literal meaning of “first”, as it is correctly translated even in the English as FIRST among those 51 depictions, and not, “beginning”.

Now that you understand that a massive grammatical error has always existed in such a key section of scripture, which has been used to influence two of the world’s largest organized religions; we can now move on and see the corrected rendering of those ancient texts which have remained so misunderstood.
More importantly, how they pertain specifically to who our souls truly are, who the rebel souls are, and what they are still doing with us. Then we will move on to the modern emerging sciences that are correlating all of this presently.

Click on the Book Cover to Buy the book!

← Previous Post